
(Wiimote, WMD with PPC64 patches and patched Python, Inkscape.)

(Wiimote, WMD with PPC64 patches and patched Python, Inkscape.)
I am going to be largely offline over christmas and new year. I have a Wiimote to play with from GNU/Linux and will be soldering up a sensor bar for it. I've also got some colour sensors when my soldering station arrives. I also have lots of reading to do and some thinking about exactly what to get up to next year.
Have a good Christmas and new year.
I'm on myspace. If you are astonishingly cool I'll add you as a friend. Failing that, if you've always wondered what I look like I have photos:
http://www.myspace.com/robmyers
To answer your question, this is in a separate compartment to anything I have to do with Free Culture. Much like my Second Life membership...
Sun have made Duke "Free graphics". His graphics are BSD licensed (not BY...), and some are Illustrator postcript files which are a bit difficult to load. So here they are converted to SVG:
One has some bad artefacts on Duke's-actually what is that? A nose? An eye? Anyway, the red blob isn't very good on one of the images. If anyone can fix that let me know.
See Duke's homepage for more info, 3D files and more images. No idea how Duke's freedom interacts with his trademark status. Someone should definitely produce some Duke pr0n to see how this works. ;-)
I read "Promises To Keep".
It's a fact-tastic read, crammed with data and diagrams, and a very well argued thesis, with the two places where the argument doesn't follow from the examples sticking out like sore thumbs (these are minor parts of the argument, I mention this simply to emphasize how coherent the rest of the book is).
I still have a problem with ACSes, although that is one less problem than I had before reading the book. The balance of privacy and accuracy that the system must strike seems much more plausible from Fisher's description, but someone like me who listens to old Art & Language songs, fantastically obscure electronica and people with cellos and digital delays won't be reflected by any system that tries to be representative by sampling rather than by monitoring the entire network.
The problem is that an ACS is still phrased in terms of "incentivisation" and of replacing lost revenue. Comparisons to a "pizza right" aside, I think this argument needs recasting positively and progressively rather than in its current reformist mode. Present it to the record companies as compensation by all means, but let's see if it can work and take it forward as the first genuinely democratic form of patronage.
They say art killed Pollock, as if that could be!
In fact he missed a bend and drove his Ford into a tree.Â
- Art & Language and The Red Crayola.
The latest Lessig letter has lots of good stuff in it:
The new CC site design, which is cool.
The new license chooser, shaped like a jigsaw and based on intent, which is extremely cool and hopefully will give people more of an idea what they are and aren't allowing when they choose a license.
The new license icons, which make the modules much clearer.
A nod and a wink about FDL compatibility. As long as this is SFDL compatibility, which would answer all my practical objections, I now think this is a good idea.
And a "secondary rights" idea which isn't ideal but which Lessig is open about discussion of, which frankly is better than a perfect idea that isn't open to debate.
Take a look:
The Gowers Report contains some recommended measures regarding enforcement of copyright that should cause concern, but it also has some wonderful new proposals for "Flexibility" in copyright that I personally think are very good news for artists.
The Executive Summary on page 11 lists:
Recommendation 8: A private copying exception for format shifting.
This means that people won't be put off buying your work because they aren't allowed to rip it to their media players. Currently it is illegal to rip music to an iPod in the UK.
Recommendation 9: A private copying exception for research.
This is good for people undertaking research outside of an academic context. Copying for research in a commercial context was recently removed from Fair Dealing, making mood boards illegal unless you tear up your books.
Recommendation 11: An exception for transformative works.
This sounds like Transformative Fair Use: "transformative or derivative works, within the parameters of the Berne Three Step Test." This is the measure I would most like to see adopted. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_three-step_test for the Three Step Test.
Recommendation 12: An exception for caricature, parody or pastiche.
We don't currently have a parody right in the UK, unlike the US, although many people who have got their understanding of copyright law from US web sites and books assume that we do. Parody, pastiche and transformative use together cover much of Fair Use for artists.
Recommendation 13: A provision for orphan works.
Or at least proposing one to the European Commission. So if you don't set up your estate to handle your work properly after your death it won't be lost, and if you wish to capitalize on work whose rightsholder has disappeared you don't run the risk of suddenly getting sued.
We need to start lobbying the government *now* to make sure that these measures are made law.
The golden age of hundreds of writers who lived off of nothing but their royalties is bunkum. Throughout history, writers have relied on day jobs, teaching, grants, inheritances, translation, licensing and other varied sources to make ends meet. The Internet not only sells more books for me, it also gives me more opportunities to earn my keep through writing-related activities.
The same is true for artists.